I’ve never been a big fan of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for body composition assessments, particularly for athletes. Jeff Stout and his colleagues at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln produced several studies years ago that revealed the BIA procedure was flawed in assessing body fat levels in lean, muscular people.

Even compared to a basic 3-site skinfold test, BIA couldn’t remain consistent or accurate.

See Also:
I really want to add some good muscle size, but I just don’t have the time to train for hours each day and the eating you guys do just won’t fit in my schedule. Is there a less time consuming and less burdensome way to build muscle?

A recent body composition study utilized bioelectrical impedance analysis on bodybuilders and powerlifters and failed to perform as accurately as a traditional 5-site skinfold assessment.

For an accurate, economical body fat assessment stick with the skinfold caliper test done by an experienced, certified trainer at your local gym.

Question?
Your question was successfully sent! It will be answered shortly.



4 + 4 =

I read your report on the error margin in bioimpedance devices and I wanted to know if you were referring to the average person or athletes?

by Paul Cribb Ph.D. CSCS. time to read: 1 min